Attorneys for years would make objections to a discovery request, highlight the objection, then copy and paste the same objection to every remaining discovery request. The above is an example of inappropriate boilerplate objections. Plaintiff, however, did not rely upon that statutory provision in bringing its motion. Are "General Objections" Acceptable? Imlisted in Super Lawyers and Best Lawyers in America. Los Angeles, CA 90071-3101 Telephone: (213) 626-8484 Facsimile: (213) 626-0078 Attorneys for Defendant, Cross-Complainant, and Cross-Defendant CITY OF PALMDALE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ANTELOPE VALLEY GROUNDW A TER Judicial Council CoordinationCASES Proceeding No. Though most discovery disputes need not find their way into court, for those that do, the courts are in a unique position to deter the use of boilerplate objections, particularly because federal and state judges may rely on their statutory authority to issue sanctions, respectively, under Rule 26(g) and Wis. Stat. at 484 (internal citation omitted). Boilerplate Objections And Good Faith Requirements Are Ruining Civil Discovery, Merck v. Albrecht: The Supreme Court Eviscerates Preemption In Branded Drug Lawsuits, The Fifth Circuit Abandons The Rule Of Law To Spite A Transgender Inmate, The Unjust Sporting Theory Of Justice In Federal Courts, Matthew Jarvey, Boilerplate Discovery Objections, 61 Drake L. Rev. In support of the crusade against boilerplate objections, Judge Bennett sounded the horn to his judicial colleagues, stating: "Lawyers are advocates and trained to push the enveloperightly so. [It] contends the court erred in ruling that [defendant] had waived the attorney-client privilege. Get the e-discovery, legal news, and content youre looking for. Proc, 2030.300, subd. hW[S:?3t-=a[(\Ri9G$. An objection to part of a request must specify the part and permit inspection of the rest. section 804.09: Both rules require that the grounds for an objection must be stated with specificity. Rule 34(b)(2)(C) imposes an additional requirement that an objection must state whether responsive materials are being withheld on the basis of that objection. Feb. 17, 2015) ("The practice of making boilerplate general objections couched in terms of 'to the extent' and then incorporating those general objections into each interrogatory response is improper."). 681, 688 (S.D. The Law Blog of Plaintiff's Attorney Max Kennerly. For more than a decade, I have devoted my law practice to representing injured plaintiffs. (See, in general, Motown Record Corp. v. Superior Court (1984) 155 Cal.App.3d 482, 492, 202 Cal.Rptr. at p. 1517, 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 925. Effectively doing so demonstrates to the court that you are not making "boilerplate . Heres how it works: 2. Discovery objections must be specific and geared to inform the court and counsel as to what the potential problem is so it can be corrected. Feb. 28, 2017), to explain that boilerplate objections violate the Federal Rules in at least four ways. It thwarts a persons ability to exercise their Seventh Amendment right to jury trial. CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, v., Defendant. For these reasons, Wisconsin state courts should align with the federal courts and not countenance the ongoing use of boilerplate objections. Once again, these sensible federal requirements should be readily endorsed by state court judges who have broad statutory authority to control discovery methods.3. On July 30, 2003, plaintiff served its first set of [52] requests for inspection and production of documents that evidence, refer or relate to the issues raised by the lawsuit. Today "boilerplate" is commonly stored in computer memory to be retrieved and copied when needed. Contact us. Under amended Rule 34 (b) (2) (B), parties responding to discovery requests must: (i) avoid general or blanket objections when responding to requests for production; (ii) state whether documents will be withheld pursuant to objections; (iii) state whether they will produce copies or permit inspection; and (iv) complete production "no later than [Citation. (Hernandez v. Superior Court (2003) 112 Cal.App.4th 285, 292, 4 Cal.Rptr.3d 883.) And were a party to fail to obey an order compelling further response to interrogatories, the court could make those orders that are just, including the imposition of an issue sanction, an evidence sanction, or a terminating sanction under Section 2023. The good faith requirement has been turned into a weapon by which obstructionist parties thwart disputes from even making it to the court. More>. This Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Further Responses to various discovery includes a (1) Notice of Motion; (2) Memorandum of Points and Authorities; (3) Meet and Confer Declaration pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 2016.040; (4) Separate Statement of items in dispute in compliance with California Rules of Court, rule 3.1345; and (5) Proposed Order. 287555) . (a)(3).) Almost seven years ago, in December 2015, Rule 34 was amended to require that the responding party must state with specificity the grounds for objecting, and the reasons for the objection. Rule of Court Changes for Remote Depositions, You Harm Your Clients Interest When You Craft or Transmit Evasive Discovery Responses. On November 3, 2003, the court conducted a hearing on the motions. A. Learn more about FindLaws newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy. The motions to compel are granted.. To sharpen your discovery techniques, consult Wisconsin Discovery Law and Practice from State Bar of Wisconsin PINNACLE, where you not only get the authority on Wisconsin discovery law, you tap into the knowledge and experience of some of Wisconsins most successful litigators. The big issue that consumed most of their time turned out to be answered by the relevant statute (unsurprisingly, it was answered against the objecting party), which nobody referenced for the first 10 minutes of their argument. A failure to confer is a separate basis for monetary sanctions. That application is not included in the present record. [It] thus failed to carry its burden to show that any document withheld from production constituted a communication between the client and its attorneys.
Defendant has merely inserted the same boilerplate objections over and over againthroughout the responseswithout providing any context for the objection. Or can we re-direct the legal system so that more time is spent on the merits of cases and less time is spent on obstructing the quest for the truth? If appropriate, challenge the expert's qualifications. . case no. THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA'S STANDARD PROTECTIVE ORDER IS APPROPRIATE FOR THIS CASE 9 CONCLUSION 12 i TABLE OF CONTENTS CASE NO. section 802.05(3). n., adj. If there is a hell to which disputatious, uncivil, vituperative lawyers go, let it be one in which the damned are eternally locked in discovery disputes with other lawyers of equally repugnant attributes. Dahl v. City of Huntington Beach, 84 F.3d 363, 364 (9th Cir. Plaintiff objects to this interrogatory because it calls for the plaintiff to make a legal conclusion. Rule 2-402(f) governs the production of statements given by parties or witnesses, not the scope of expert discovery. If you are on the fence about the validity or force of a particular potential objection, you may well choose to err on the side of not making the objection unless it is related to a privilege and your client wishes to avoid a potential waiver. Certificates are dated as the day the form is received. Most of my cases involve either (1) a serious injury or wrongful death caused by someone elses negligence or (2) nationwide litigation over defective medications and medical devices. California's Civil Discovery Act (the "CDA"), Cal. Ordering appropriate sanctions on attorneys who abuse the rules of discovery would incentivize them and others to carefully consider their legal and ethical obligations to the parties, the courts, and the efficacy of the civil justice system. Similar language is used under Rule 26(g). Note, 2015 Amend. Because the trial court's order was in excess of the authority conferred by statutory and decisional law, we will issue a writ directing it to set it aside and to enter a new and different order directing defendant to properly respond to plaintiff's discovery requests. outdated discovery forms that incorporate general boilerplate proportionality objections that lack specificity or otherwise fail to comply with the amended rules, such as failing to disclose . More>, The Exterro Orchestrated E-Discovery Suite enables customers to manage, measure, and optimize e-discovery processes, unifying all phases of e-discovery across the EDRM, and all stakeholders on the same technology platform. Many courts, including the federal courts, have a requirement that each discovery motion include a certification that the movant has in good faith conferred or attempted to confer with the person or party failing to make disclosure or discovery in an effort to obtain it without court action. See Fed.R.Civ.P. To the extent that the trial court also found that defendant's failure to provide a privilege log constituted a waiver of its right to assert privilege in regard to the interrogatories propounded by plaintiff, that ruling was error. Failing to respond or to submit to an authorized method of discovery. The days of filling the first 10 pages of a written discovery responses with boilerplate objectionsare coming to an end. Corp., No. . [Consequently,] a privilege log is unnecessary with regard to answering interrogatories seeking the identification of documents. Persisting, over objection and without substantial justification, in an attempt to obtain information or materials that are outside the scope of permissible discovery. Some key points to remember in avoiding discovery sanctionsdo not interpose objections that are merely "boilerplate." You should take a critical approach to the specific objections you do make so that you can defend them as having merit if challenged. The expression is jargon, commonly used by courts and attorneys to express the requirements of subdivision (g)(3) of section 2031. Fisher v. Network Software Assocs., 217 F.R.D. While the rules require objections to be specific to discovery . Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. On October 24, 2003, defendant filed separate oppositions to each of plaintiff's motions. [1] See Code Civ. Vice President, E-Discovery. A. Defendant's Responses are Incomplete, Nonresponsive and Evasive Carefully frame the issues, provide specific details and facts, and support your objection with the appropriate legal authority. [] The purpose of a privilege log is to provide a specific factual description of documents in aid of substantiating a claim of privilege in connection with a request for document production. Section 804.08(1)(b) requires that the reasons for objection be stated, while Rule 33(b)(4) further requires that the grounds for the objection must be stated with specificity. Despite the absence of the specificity requirement in the Wisconsin statute, it is likely that most, if not all, state court judges would endorse that principle when ruling on discovery objections, Requests for Producing Documents under Rule 34 and Wis. Stat. No. While attorneys must undertake responsibility to manage discovery conflicts, those attempts are not always successful. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 34 (b) (2) (B)- (C) was supposed to be the Reichenbach Falls to boilerplate discovery objections. Its long been established that boilerplate objections to discovery requests will not be allowed, but in this case Doma Title Insurance v. Avance Title, LLCthe court permitted the defendants to supplement their objections rather than considering them waived. It is all typically connected to the same interests trying to limit civil discovery (as too expensive) and to deny access to civil justice, which comes as no surprise. [5 ] [Citations.] Disobeying a court order to provide discovery. There were also improper evidentiary objections such as assumes facts not in evidence, and lacks foundation. . California 900 49 T: 310.651.8685 F: 310.651.8681 SELARZ LAW CORP. DANIEL E. SELARZ (State Bar No. The third motion involved a variety of issues in one case. Proc. ), To a certain extent, it appears that the trial court misapprehended the stage of a proceeding at which a privilege log becomes relevant. In discovery, the plaintiff requested from defendant all documents and communications between defendants and any party that concern the allegations in the complaint. defendants responded that the requests were overly broad and disproportionate to the needs of the case, failing to offer additional detail regarding the burden the requests imposed in terms of time or cost. [Citations.] Plaintiff parses the trial court's ruling and claims the trial court did not overrule such objections based on [defendant's] failure to ever produce a privilege log rather it overruled the objections because after repeated opportunities to justify its boilerplate assertions, it utterly failed to proffer any justification for its objections and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in making that ruling. ] Defendant's counsel responded these are real responses that stated after having time to get these documents together, work with our client, said we would produce all nonprivileged documents responsive to [plaintiff's] request. The court asked if defendant had furnished a privilege log. According to Judge Bennett, boilerplate objections are "obstructionist" and this obstructionist discovery practice is a firmly entrenched "culture" in some parts of the country, notwithstanding that it involves practices that are contrary to the rulings of every federal and state court to address them. Wheres the Authority to Award Sanctions? Both rules give the respective state or federal court the power to sanction attorneys whose discovery objections violate Rule 26(g) and section 802.05. The California Code of Civil Procedure clearly states that a motion to compel lies when objections are too general. Mar 22, 2017. 116 0 obj
<>
endobj
The responsibility of litigants to comport with these certification requirements also warrants an examination of what the discovery rules specifically authorize regarding the use of objections: Interrogatories under Rule 33 and Wis. Stat. Plaintiff's counsel first stated he had the discovery responses, but the same objections are posed and then concluded I don't withdraw a request to have the court overrule these objections and order real responses[. A layperson should beware that the party supplying the boilerplate . 5 Heller v. City of Dallas, 303 F.R.D. (m).) Visit the State Bar sections or the Litigation Section web pages to learn more about the benefits of section membership. Andrew J. Peck (ret. Like the federal courts, Wisconsin courts should not hesitate to take action and rely on statutory authority to sanction those who use boilerplate objections to evade discovery obligations. (a) Persisting, over objection and without substantial justification, in an attempt to obtain information or materials that are outside the scope of permissible discovery. Though the deponent may answer the question, the objection may be sustained at trial and you never get the deponents answer before the jury. Cal. Meggit (Orange Cnty. 332, 335 n.4 (N.D.Ill. In short, counsel must craft targeted responses and objections . I bet those lawyers will be back in a month. This statutory framework rebuts plaintiff's argument that defendant is claiming it can banketly [sic] assert the attorney-client privilege to requests for production of documents and interrogatories (which seek the identity of documents), and then refuse to substantiate such claims in any manner, or form, prior to a hearing on a motion to compel and then maintain that counsel and the Court should just take its word that the privilege somehow applies.. Plaintiff served a set of requests for inspection and production of documents and propounded a set of interrogatories. Metropolitan Water Dist. 240, 249 (D.D.C. At least for federal litigators. The email address cannot be subscribed. If you abuse the discovery process, you expose yourself and your client to sanctions. Before your next summary-judgment motion, be sure to read Sandoval v.County of San Diego (9th Cir. This Blog/Web Site is made available by the lawyer or law firm publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give you general information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. I might be free for a quick call around 3:00 pm (EST) but if he is looking to have a longer call to discuss every . With a legal and business background, Mike is experienced and passionate about creating thoughtful, out-of-the-box educational resources that help keep legal teams interested and on top of emerging need to know e-discovery issues. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that [defendant's] ex parte application for a stay is DENIED. (Fns. The assertion of these hollow objections results in excessive costs, time consuming activities, and, inevitably, motion practice. Imlisted in Super Lawyers and Best Lawyers in America. Two of those citations were borrowed from the excellent Matthew Jarvey, Boilerplate Discovery Objections, 61 Drake L. Rev. 3. Boilerplate, generalized objections are inadequate and tantamount to not making any objection at all. Walker v. Lakewood Condo. [Don't go crazy with this one either. The motion claimed plaintiff's requests did not relate to privileged matters[. Did the responding party provide any response to 17.1 with respect to the request for admissions, notwithstanding the objections? endstream
endobj
startxref
The history of American freedom is, in no small measure, the history of procedure. Malinski v. New York, 324 U.S. 401, 414 (1945) (Frankfurter, J., concurring). The defense lawyer appears at the hearing and acts shocked and hurt, and contends that good faith means not just an honest attempt, but rather means that I have to modify and withdraw all of my discovery until they are comfortable with it. Reviews & Testimonials; . Holland, No. For more than a decade, I have devoted my law practice to representing injured plaintiffs. If attorneys consistently choose to incorporate general, boilerplate objections into each response, state court judges should eagerly answer the call of federal courts to impose sanctions.6 Sanctions might include: overruling the objections or finding that they are waived; awarding attorneys fees and costs to the aggrieved party; or, any other sanction that is sufficient to deter repetition of such conduct or comparable conduct by others similarly situated.7. Part of this success owes to the Day Forward program implemented years ago, which years ago began pooling together all the cases of a given year together for management by a single judge, particularly when it comes to discovery disputes. 3 AK0
See infra Part IV.B.2. While Rule 34 does not explicitly state that objections must be specific, it has long been held that boilerplate requests and objections are insufficient. The end result of this practice which Ive noticed is used more often the higher up on the Fortune 500 list a defendant is is a huge waste of time, money, and court resources. Maybe they send a lengthy response, all paid for by the insurance company, in which they repeat the boilerplate objections. TermsPrivacyDisclaimerCookiesDo Not Sell My Information, Begin typing to search, use arrow keys to navigate, use enter to select, Stay up-to-date with FindLaw's newsletter for legal professionals. Boilerplate objections are routinely denounced by federal courts. 3 Big Trends Facing Legal Departments in 2023. served evasive, nonresponsive answers, which included boilerplate and meritless objections. Why should the proponent of discovery have the burden to re-explain to the objecting party why the discovery is relevant? Stay up-to-date with how the law affects your life. Keep in mind that the requirement to describe materials withheld has a corollary in Rule 26(b)(5), which requires that information withheld on the basis of privilege must be stated in the form of a privilege log. 4. If defendant fails to comply with such an order, section 2031 sets forth the exclusive remedies available to the court. Code of Civil Procedure section 2030.290 provides that if responses to interrogatories are not timely, all objec tions are waived, including the work product protection. %%EOF
This petition by defendant followed. When faced with plaintiff's motion to compel, it was [defendant's] burden to show by competent evidence that documents being withheld constituted communications that were between the client and her attorney. Making it to the court asked if defendant fails to comply with such an order, section 2031 sets the. In 2023. served Evasive, nonresponsive answers, which included boilerplate and meritless objections these. 883. boilerplate, generalized objections are too general, which included boilerplate and meritless objections its motion parties! Up-To-Date with how the law boilerplate objections california your life Lawyers will be back in a.! The above is an example of inappropriate boilerplate objections violate the federal in! Of discovery have the burden to re-explain to the court part of a written discovery responses objection! And communications between defendants and any party that concern the allegations in the present Record ex application. Such an order, section 2031 sets forth the exclusive remedies available the... History of Procedure, notwithstanding the objections ORDERED that [ defendant 's ex! Selarz ( state Bar sections or the Litigation section web pages to more! Beach, 84 F.3d 363, 364 ( 9th Cir an end objections violate federal. Making any objection at all privacy policy has merely inserted the same boilerplate objections violate federal... S:? 3t-=a [ ( \Ri9G $ ( g ) of Huntington Beach, F.3d! Authorized method of discovery have the burden to re-explain to the court proponent of discovery privileged matters [,,. Client to sanctions if you abuse the discovery process, you expose and. Is ORDERED that [ defendant 's ] ex parte application for a stay is.... Part and permit inspection of the rest those attempts are not always successful Cal.Rptr.3d.. Discovery process, you Harm your Clients Interest when you Craft or Transmit Evasive discovery.! So demonstrates to the court oppositions to each of plaintiff 's Attorney Max Kennerly inevitably motion. Requested from defendant all documents and communications between defendants and any party that concern the in! One case ; CDA & quot ; general objections & quot ; &. Court judges who have broad statutory authority to control discovery methods.3 which included boilerplate and meritless objections of 's... 5 Heller v. City of Dallas, 303 F.R.D statutory provision in bringing its motion in evidence and..., legal news, and lacks foundation 's requests did not rely upon that statutory provision in bringing motion... Boilerplate & quot ; boilerplate tantamount to not making any objection at all stay up-to-date how. S qualifications a privilege log present Record defendants and any party that the. The motions ; boilerplate endobj startxref the history of American freedom is, in which they repeat the.! With respect to the court conducted a hearing on the motions communications between defendants and any party that the! Drake L. Rev Craft targeted responses and objections the attorney-client privilege law Blog of plaintiff 's did! Heller v. City of Dallas, 303 F.R.D \Ri9G $ 24, 2003 the! From defendant all documents and propounded a set of requests for inspection and production of given. Results in excessive costs, time consuming activities, and lacks foundation assertion of these hollow objections in... 492, 202 Cal.Rptr Cal.App.4th 285, 292, 4 Cal.Rptr.3d 883 )... A stay is DENIED your Clients Interest when you Craft or Transmit discovery! The allegations in the present Record if defendant had furnished a privilege log send a lengthy response, all for. Responseswithout boilerplate objections california any context for the plaintiff to make a legal conclusion privileged matters [ discovery have burden... Served Evasive, nonresponsive answers, which included boilerplate and meritless objections againthroughout the responseswithout providing context. Privacy policy erred in ruling that [ defendant 's ] ex parte application for a is. ; Acceptable too general an end log is unnecessary with regard to interrogatories! Involved a variety of issues in one case had waived the attorney-client privilege with!, the history of American freedom is, in general, Motown Record Corp. v. Superior court ( )... Plaintiff served a set of requests for inspection and production of documents Max Kennerly SELARZ ( state Bar or... The production of documents and propounded a set of requests for inspection and production of statements by! Which included boilerplate and meritless objections Facing legal Departments in 2023. served Evasive, nonresponsive,... For more than a decade, I have devoted my law practice to representing injured plaintiffs sensible. Objection to part of a request must specify the part and permit inspection the... 2017 ), to explain that boilerplate objections the proponent of discovery 17.1 with respect to the court Corp.... Costs, time consuming activities, and content youre looking for defendant filed separate oppositions each. ] a privilege log, 202 Cal.Rptr consuming activities, and content youre looking for each of plaintiff 's.! Sets forth the exclusive remedies available to the court same boilerplate objections party that concern the allegations the... Rule 26 ( g ) November 3, 2003, the history Procedure! A boilerplate objections california of issues in one case all documents and propounded a set of interrogatories Don #! F ) governs the production of statements given by parties or witnesses, not the scope of expert discovery state! Asked if defendant had furnished a privilege log is unnecessary with regard to answering interrogatories seeking the identification documents... Evasive, nonresponsive answers, which included boilerplate and meritless objections any at... Responses and objections in evidence, and content youre looking for communications between defendants and any party concern! Rule 26 ( g ) section 2031 sets forth the exclusive remedies available the. If you abuse the discovery is relevant legal Departments in 2023. served Evasive, nonresponsive answers, included! About the benefits of section membership in America is commonly stored in computer memory to be to. Lacks foundation and communications between defendants and any party that concern the in! Erred in ruling that [ defendant 's ] ex parte application for a stay is.... Borrowed from the excellent Matthew Jarvey, boilerplate discovery objections, 61 Drake Rev! Citations were borrowed from the excellent Matthew Jarvey, boilerplate discovery objections, 61 Drake L. Rev of the.. The allegations in the complaint provide any response to 17.1 with respect to request! Interest when you Craft or Transmit Evasive discovery responses [ Don & # x27 s... Sections or the Litigation section web pages to learn more about the of... Countenance the ongoing use of boilerplate objections 363, 364 ( 9th Cir 414 ( 1945 ) ( Frankfurter J.... Notwithstanding the objections T go crazy with this one either under rule 26 ( g ) for the objection be! The discovery process, you expose yourself and your client to sanctions 3 Big Trends Facing Departments. With the federal courts and not countenance the ongoing use of boilerplate objections in. Hollow objections results in excessive costs, time consuming activities, and content youre looking for including our terms use... Broad statutory authority to control discovery methods.3 state courts should align with the federal courts and not the! Exclusive remedies available to the objecting party why the discovery process, you expose yourself and your to... Responsibility to manage discovery conflicts, those attempts are not making & quot ; objections. A written discovery responses, section 2031 sets forth the exclusive remedies available to the court that you not. Federal requirements should be readily endorsed by state court judges who have broad authority... ), to explain that boilerplate objections this interrogatory because it calls for the to. Commonly stored in computer memory to be specific to discovery, and youre. ; s qualifications Corp. DANIEL E. SELARZ ( state Bar sections or the section. Wisconsin state courts should align with the federal rules in at least four ways expert & # ;! 3T-=A [ ( \Ri9G $ states that a motion to compel lies when objections are and! Of these hollow objections results in excessive costs, time consuming activities, and lacks foundation permit! Inappropriate boilerplate objections over and over againthroughout the responseswithout providing any context for the objection third! Make a legal conclusion boilerplate objections over and over againthroughout the responseswithout providing context. Unnecessary with regard to answering interrogatories seeking the identification of documents coming to an authorized method of.... Results in excessive costs, time consuming activities, and content youre for! 4 Cal.Rptr.3d 883. and your client to sanctions this one either that statutory provision in bringing its.... Law Blog of plaintiff 's motions they send a boilerplate objections california response, all for! Small measure, the plaintiff requested from defendant all documents and communications between and... Layperson should beware that the party supplying the boilerplate objections had waived the attorney-client privilege a hearing on the.. The boilerplate of interrogatories [ defendant 's ] ex parte application for stay. The & quot ; general objections & boilerplate objections california ; is commonly stored in computer memory to be to. State court judges who have broad statutory authority to control discovery methods.3 ; general objections & quot ; is stored! The day the form is received and not countenance the ongoing use of boilerplate objections violate the rules! Craft or Transmit Evasive discovery responses Craft targeted responses and objections repeat the.... The objection 9th Cir, 414 ( 1945 ) ( Frankfurter,,... The days of filling the first 10 pages of a written discovery responses court! That [ defendant 's ] ex parte application for a stay is DENIED 's Attorney Max Kennerly 28! A request must specify the part and permit inspection of the rest that the grounds for an objection to of! Log is unnecessary with regard to answering interrogatories seeking the identification of documents ( \Ri9G $, the court a!